Virginia Tech Massacre Update 2

UPDATE FROM YOUR NEW REALITY:

Killer Shot Himself, Through The Back Of The Head, Blowing Out His Face 

This is an update to the post below.

According to Darryl Mason of Your New Reality:

A reporter on SBS News in Australia, doing a live cross from outside Virginia Tech, just claimed that he received information that there was a “mystery” about the identity of the man who went on a killing spree inside classrooms at Virginia Tech.The reporter said police are now thinking there were two killers, one who shot the female student and student advisor in a dorm just after 7am, and another who did the killings in the Norris Hall Engineering block two hours later.He said if there was no connection between the two shooting sprees it would be something of a “monumental coincidence” to have two shootings on the same campus within two hours of each other.Apparently the descriptions of the man who was seen leaving the dorm and the man who killed more than 30 students on the other side of the campus, at Norris Hall, do not match up.News on this is still breaking, so the “mystery” may already be resolved by the time you read this. However, the possibility of two separate killers would give credence to police and college officials’ claims that they believed the shootings were over once police had secured the dorm, even though the gunman had not been detained.A second killer would explain how officials and police were taken completely by surprise by the second, far more deadly, shooting spree.However, the official story thus far gets murky. The same report on SBS News also said that email warnings were circulated to students to look out for someone who may be dangerous and for students to report suspicious behaviour to police or officials, just before the second shooting spree began.Presumably, this e-mail warning refers to the first killer, who is believed to have left the dorm after he shot his girlfriend and a student advisor, if that story actually stands up to scrutinising. And there’s no guarantee that the facts as known of the first shooting will not change as well.

The gunman suspected of carrying out the Virginia Tech massacre that left 33 people dead was identified Tuesday as a English major whose creative writing was so disturbing that he was referred to the school’s counseling service.

Cho Seung-Hui, a 23-year-old senior, arrived in the United States as boy from South Korea in 1992 and was raised in suburban Washington, D.C., officials said. He was living on campus in a different dorm from the one where Monday’s bloodbath began.

Two writers, two different stories. Who’s right? Lone gunman, or two?

Read them and judge:

Gunman’s Writings Were Disturbing 

A Second Killer Escaped the Police?

7 responses

  1. Darryl Mason himself admitted that this post is updated periodically so he might be behind Yahoo!News. We’ll see.

  2. OK, I’m no expert on guns (never held one) and I’m no expert on security (hate most cops) but, when I heard the President/Principal of V. Tech casually say yesterday, “Yes, we had a double homocide at 7:15am but, we thought it was a domestic matter and the shooter had left campus…,” I thought, what the fuck is he saying?

    A double homocide on campus and they didn’t immediately shut down the university? I mean, am I missing something here?

  3. That’s why there’s all this black ops talk,why didn’t the Chancellor shut the place up?

    Then to top it off, the guy might’ve left and come back to finish the job. That’s why there’s a theory about two shooters.

    Foil away!

  4. So, to what end? To create a distraction from the Bush nightmare and to give our dictator a chance to warble cornpone-laced niceties on TV which would hopefully raise his rock-bottom approval numbers?

    All I know is if there had been a double homocide at the university I attended, the place would’ve been shutdown like Federal prison.

  5. Investigators found some kind of notebook with some stuff this guy had written. Crazy shit. This stuff does not happen in a vacuum. But is it a NWO black-ops?

  6. If this was a murder/suicide like the cops thought at first, didn’t they notice that there wasn’t a gun at this first scene? You’d think they would have realized right then that there was a killer on the loose! Dumbasses.

    I think the shooter killed those two people in cold blood, went back to his place where he wrote the note, and then continued an hour or two later to continue the killing.

    I could be wrong, but I think there was only one shooter. Seems plausible.

  7. I agree Kay. It looks more and more the kid was the only shooter, despite what others might think. The evidence just doesn’t support two shooters, or “appears” not to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: