Daily Archives: August 4th, 2009

Moon and Mars Mysteries

Far be it for me to question common sense or wisdom (if you believe that, I have some swampland in Arizona to sell ya!), but hasn’t anyone noticed that NASA and everybody else’s’ plan for exploring the Moon getting drawn away?

And all this attention given to Buzz Aldrin’s supposed mention on CSPAN of a “monolith” on one of Mars’ moon, Phobos? What’s up with that?

Are we being distracted? Why?

And are UFOs involved?

The reason I’m asking these questions is because the panel requested by CFR backed US President Obama to rethink NASA’s “Road Map to Space” (an unfunded mandate by former President Bu$hco) is more than likely is going to recommend that the US go away from exploring the Moon.

Instead, the panel suggests that NASA concentrate on using the Orion capsule to explore Lagrange points in lunar and Earth orbits and “docking” with asteroids.

I realize that money , or lack thereof might be a huge reason for some of these changes in policy, and god knows that the US as a viable economic entity might become a thing of the past sooner than later, so it could have larger fish to fry than lunar exploration shortly.

But IMHO, the Moon provides resources that are close-by to be exploited, re, three days travel by even primitive rockets. Plus the Moon is a natural (?)satellite that can be used as a military base of operations.

Whoa. Did I say ‘military?’

That my friends, could be the answer right there.

According to UFO lore, President Eisenhower met with some supposed ‘aliens’ back in 1954 and signed some treaties.

Now from what I’ve researched of that, it was mainly about letting the aliens sample people for genetic studies, but could some of the language of the treaties have set ‘boundries’ for human exploration of the Solar System and beyond possibly?

In fact, the 1960 Brookings Report about ET contact claims that such contact stemming from interplanetary exploration would throw world societies into total chaos, unable to recover.

And one other legend that will not die is the supposed “Apollo 20” video that records an ancient spaceship in a crater on the Moon.

Is that b.s. too? Or did it happen?

All I see is that every time someone suggests we (meaning human beings) go back to the Moon to either explore, exploit for resources, set up bases or colonize, there’s a thousand and one reasons that pop up to kill such endeavors.

It’ll be interesting to see if NASA still carries out this LCROSS crash into a crater in the southern lunar hemisphere (crater with water?) this fall.

If it doesn’t happen, or the mainstream media doesn’t mention anything about it at all, I’ll be all the more curious.

So now we’re supposed to set our sights on Mars because Moon exploration is so ‘old hat’ now eh?

Or more exactly, the moons of Mars?

Okay, I’ll buy that.

In fact, I discussed this with Quasar9 one time. He wasn’t too thrilled about it, so we agreed to disagree.

My argument was that because a planet had a deep gravity well, it was harder to exploit for resources, thus, we need to go for the asteroids.

And lo and behold, for the very reasons the space exploratory panel suggests.

I didn’t suggest they use asteroids as stepping stones to get to the moons of Mars (I suggested the asteroid belt beyond Mars).

And that’s where I think Mr. Aldrin came in with his ‘monolith’ on Phobos schpeel.

Was that an attempt to influence discource on that panel?

I’m sure it was.

So, you’re gonna say “some space exploration is better than none Dad”, and I’ll agree with that.

What I’m saying is that “there might be more than what we’re being told.”

Yeah, I know, tin-foil bullshit and all that.

And I didn’t even bring up the fact we’re going waaaay out of our way to avoid bringing any kind of nuclear powered equipment into space, even if it would make things a thousand times easier to plan and operate.

And don’t even tell me about those bullshit non-nuclear treaties we’ve already broken with our military programs.

Maybe tomorrow.