The Land of Woo and Biocentrism

I am not a scientist of any kind, in any sense of the definition.

Theories in science, especially nowadays, have taken on an aura that feels like stepping onto a speeding subway train without it stopping to let you on.

Now, I know that I have posted about various theories of quantum physics and its relationship to the mainstream world in the past and have been roundly flamed for it, especially since I really don’t know what I’m talking about.

But how does one learn, if one doesn’t take the occasional plunge into the deep end of the pool?

This next supremely interesting theory is named biocentrism and it’s proponent is Dr. Robert Lanza, a medical doctor.

Biocentrism, in a word, is all about what our brain perceives in the outside world, how it interprets it and a possible relationship with quantum physics:

Many of us fear death. We believe in death because we have been told we will die. We associate ourselves with the body, and we know that bodies die. But a new scientific theory suggests that death is not the terminal event we think.

One well-known aspect of quantum physics is that certain observations cannot be predicted absolutely. Instead, there is a range of possible observations each with a different probability. One mainstream explanation, the “many-worlds” interpretation, states that each of these possible observations corresponds to a different universe (the ‘multiverse’). A new scientific theory – called biocentrism – refines these ideas. There are an infinite number of universes, and everything that could possibly happen occurs in some universe. Death does not exist in any real sense in these scenarios. All possible universes exist simultaneously, regardless of what happens in any of them. Although individual bodies are destined to self-destruct, the alive feeling – the ‘Who am I?’- is just a 20-watt fountain of energy operating in the brain. But this energy doesn’t go away at death. One of the surest axioms of science is that energy never dies; it can neither be created nor destroyed. But does this energy transcend from one world to the other?

Consider an experiment that was recently published in the journal Science showing that scientists could retroactively change something that had happened in the past. Particles had to decide how to behave when they hit a beam splitter. Later on, the experimenter could turn a second switch on or off. It turns out that what the observer decided at that point, determined what the particle did in the past. Regardless of the choice you, the observer, make, it is you who will experience the outcomes that will result. The linkages between these various histories and universes transcend our ordinary classical ideas of space and time. Think of the 20-watts of energy as simply holo-projecting either this or that result onto a screen. Whether you turn the second beam splitter on or off, it’s still the same battery or agent responsible for the projection.

According to Biocentrism, space and time are not the hard  objects we think. Wave your hand through the air – if you take everything away, what’s left? Nothing. The same thing applies for time. You can’t see anything through the bone that surrounds your brain. Everything you see and experience right now is a whirl of information occurring in your mind. Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together.Death does not exist in a timeless, spaceless world. In the end, even Einstein admitted, “Now Besso” (an old friend) “has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That means nothing. People like us…know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” Immortality doesn’t mean a perpetual existence in time without end, but rather resides outside of time altogether.

Dr. Lanza isn’t the first person to propose a theory like this.

I read a story 11 years ago that had a component like this that the protagonist experienced. And how death is, or isn’t perceived.

Is this a credible hypothesis, since we all know for a fact that Death exists?

Or is it something from the Land of Woo?

Does Death Exist? New Theory Says ‘No’

Advertisements

3 responses

  1. As you said death doesn’t exist without space time. I agree but what I find plausible that our body is not organic. It’s more than that usually thought. In my blog(does complexity mean life?) I’ve raised question like this. Even dead is as complex as normal walking human but dead not alive. So I’ld like to leave it no future researches before concluding any thing. What do you think?
    BRUCELEEEOWE.

  2. I don’t know Bruce. When you think about it, how many close brushes with death have you had, any of which could’ve gone the other way?

    How would you know?

  3. http://bruceleeeowe.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/does-complexity-mean-life/
    In above link I’ve raised that question. May be I’m wrong. Just another possibility. Bruceleeeowe may not be always correct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: