Mysterious Human Origins

It is well known that Cro-Magnon Man lived along side of Neanderthal Man 30,000 to 45,000 years ago and much is speculated how that relationship existed.

Now there might be a third type of human being thrown into the mix to confuse things even more!

Scientists have identified a previously unknown type of ancient human through analysis of DNA from a finger bone unearthed in a Siberian cave.

The extinct “hominin” (human-like creature) lived in Central Asia between 48,000 and 30,000 years ago.

An international team has sequenced genetic material from the fossil showing that it is distinct from that of Neanderthals and modern humans.

Details of the find, dubbed “X-woman”, have been published in Nature journal.

Ornaments were found in the same ground layer as the finger bone, including a bracelet.

Professor Chris Stringer, human origins researcher at London’s Natural History Museum, called the discovery “a very exciting development”.

“This new DNA work provides an entirely new way of looking at the still poorly-understood evolution of humans in central and eastern Asia.”

The discovery raises the intriguing possibility that three forms of human – Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and the species represented by X-woman – could have met each other and interacted in southern Siberia.

The tiny fragment of bone from a fifth finger was uncovered by archaeologists working at Denisova Cave in Siberia’s Altai Mountains in 2008.

An international team of researchers extracted mitochondrial DNA from the bone and compared the genetic sequence with those from modern humans and Neanderthals.

It is speculated that tribes of Homo Erectus survived into this time frame, this could be the proof paleo-anthropologists need to prove the theory.

But with no other Erectus DNA to compare it with, this might be a hard sell.

Branches of Humanity are often nebulous things to grasp in our modern society and most cultures discount our biological past, so research such as this is important in understanding who we were.

And are.

DNA identifies new ancient human dubbed ‘X-woman’

___

From earthly ancestors to possible extraterrestrial (or crypto?) ones as we continue the study of human beings using DNA technology.

The Star Child Skull is famous (or infamous) for being proof positive of ET contact with humans and has many detractors of course for the obvious reasons.

Lloyd Pye has had possession of the Skull for many years and had it’s DNA tested in 2003. The findings showed that the individual had a human mother, but because the testing couldn’t resolve the father’s nuclear DNA, proof positive of the origin wasn’t forthcoming.

Now, that is about to change:

We finally have a recovery of nuclear DNA from the Starchild!

This past weekend I met with the geneticist working on the Starchild’s DNA. He explained how he can now prove the Starchild is not entirely human, which has been our position for years. Now it is no longer a question of “if,” but of “when” and “how” we spread this astounding new reality beyond the mailing list. First, though, let me bring the list’s newcomers up to speed.

In 2003 we had a DNA analysis that used human-only primers to recover the Starchild’s mitochondrial DNA, the DNA outside the nucleus, which comes from the mother and her genetic line. That meant its mother was human. But we could not recover its nuclear DNA, which comes from both mother and father, which meant its father was not a human. Unfortunately, with the recovery technology of 2003 we couldn’t prove what he was, which left us in scientific limbo. The “no result” from the search for the nuclear DNA clearly meant Dad wasn’t human, but we could not prove that fact beyond all possible doubt.

Now, in 2010, there have been many improvements in the recovery process, and those improvements have been applied to the Starchild skull with the stunning result you see below. This is a gel sheet that shows a clear recovery of its nuclear DNA, which could not be done in 2003.

The next two screen shots are taken from the national genetic database at the National Institute of Health, NIH. That public-access database is a centralized repository of all genetic information generated by geneticists all over the world, and now covers essentially all living organisms on Earth, from various kinds of viruses and bacteria, to various kinds of crustaceans and fish, to all kinds of animals and plants, including great apes and humans.

For many species, humans included, there are already nucleotide sequences covering entire genomes. Therefore, sequences from the Starchild’s DNA can be directly compared against this vast database to look for any matches. In one such comparison below, you see the text below the blue line at the bottom (if you can read it, sorry it’s so fuzzy) that 265 base pairs (a good length) of recovered Starchild nuclear DNA matches perfectly with a gene on human chromosome 1. This verifies beyond any degree of doubt that some of the nuclear DNA seen in the gel sheet is from a human being.

In the one below, and again at the bottom, you see the stunning report that in a string of 342 base pairs (another good length), “No significant similarity (is) found.” To recover a stretch of base pairs as long as that with NO reference in the NIH database is astounding because it means there is no known earthly corollary for what has been analyzed! This incredible anomaly will put the Starchild in history books!!!

Please understand that this result has now been verified several times, and a few more different fragments have been identified that cannot be matched in this database to anything known. Despite that fact, mainstream skeptics will be obligated by their positions to try to say it’s some kind of gibberish or some kind of mistake because in their world view it simply can’t be true.

Luckily, their bleating protests can be easily overcome with continued repetition of the result, finding more and more similar fragments in the library that will be created from the Starchild’s DNA, which is what the geneticist is confident will happen over the next weeks and months—nothing but verification that a significant part of the Starchild’s genome is not found on Earth.

I will investigate this further over the weekend to see if I can find other leads.

No matter if it ends up that we are genetically manipulated by ‘aliens’ (I have a feeling Mac Tonnies might be vindicated, holy synchronicity!) of some type, this will blow the lid off from various theories of Human Origins.

New Update Issued on the ‘Starchild Skull’

Today’s hat tip goes to the Anomalist.

Advertisements

16 responses

  1. starchild was debunked in national geographic’s show is it real? I’ve published your post on plasma rocket occult today in my Blog just because I think similar to what you and interesting too. does copyright matter?

    1. Naw, I’m a creative commons kind of guy Bruce. As long as you provide link-backs, all’s forgiven! 😉

  2. oh, that…..

  3. You sure that isn’t Busboy’s skull, Dad? Oh, yeah… I forgot. His comes to a point! 😆

    Too bad, though. It would be empirical evidence that the bugger’s finally dead!

    Luuuuv that word “empirical”…

    😉

  4. Actually I don’t use the word much in my various wanderings around the InnerTubes HW, and I notice when it come to ’empirical’, not too many others abide by it.

    But, hey, it’s the InnerTubes! 😆

    BTW, how is ol’ Busboy? You still tormenting him?

  5. The Highwayman | Reply

    You have to hang out in the right crowds, marine. It’s a long story…

    Busboy? Who knows? I sometimes wonder what happened to Mirthy, though. Maybe she still lurks around your site, seeing as you’re one of the few left from the old gang still posting. If she is, I hope she reads this and knows that I still think about her.

    I made a few half-assed attempts at blogging, again, but, you know how easily I make friends. Nah, I think I’ll just let well enough alone, bug you, now and then.

    Hey… remember your old buddy Morton (The Who) Devonshire? LOL! What a dickhead he was!

    1. Sporty Morty the Wiki-Mod?

      Dunno. It’s like he dropped off the face of the earth.

      We should be so lucky! 😉

  6. But if you believe this Starchild has an alien Dad and a human mum, it means that this woman made love with an alien?? How could be possible???

      1. cybersex? do aliens have facebook?

        and it is possible to have children doing cybersex (omg, maybe I’ve some cyber son somewhere :o)

      2. something new to reply..

    1. I don’t think a hybrid would be made the natural way Dr. Oltrantza, it would be made by genetic engineering.

      So is it possible? Sure.

      Did it happen? I need more convincing.

  7. I double dog dare ya!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: